VALIDITAS DAN RELIABILITAS INSTRUMEN HEALTH BELIEF MODEL PADA SKRINING KANKER SERVIKS METODE IVA

Authors

  • Triatmi Andri Yanuarini Midwifery Vocational Program, Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang, Malang, Indonesia
  • Sri Mulyani Department of Nurse Anesthesia, Vocational School, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Vitri Widyaningsih Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine,, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32831/jik.v14i2.990

Keywords:

kanker serviks, IVA, validitas, reliabilitas, Health Belief Model

Abstract

Pendahuluan: Rendahnya cakupan skrining kanker serviks metode IVA di Indonesia menunjukkan perlunya instrumen yang valid dan reliabel untuk mengidentifikasi faktor perilaku yang memengaruhi partisipasi wanita. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen berbasis Health Belief Model (HBM). Metode: Penelitian kuantitatif dengan desain cross-sectional dilakukan pada 30 wanita usia subur (30–50 tahun) di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Sukorejo pada bulan Agustus. Instrumen berupa kuesioner meliputi karakteristik biososiodemografi, pengetahuan, dan konstruk HBM (perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, dan self-efficacy). Uji validitas menggunakan korelasi Pearson product moment, sedangkan reliabilitas menggunakan Cronbach’s alpha. Hasil: Sebagian besar item dinyatakan valid (p < 0,05). Konstruk perceived benefit (α = 0,945), cues to action (α = 0,776), self-efficacy (α = 0,895), dan ketertarikan skrining (α = 0,781) menunjukkan reliabilitas baik. Namun, konstruk pengetahuan (α = 0,364), perceived susceptibility (α = 0,432), serta hambatan akses dan sistem layanan menunjukkan reliabilitas rendah bahkan negatif, serta terdapat beberapa item tidak valid yang perlu direvisi. Diskusi: Instrumen menunjukkan validitas yang baik, namun reliabilitas belum optimal pada beberapa konstruk. Hal ini mengindikasikan perlunya revisi item, terutama pada aspek hambatan dan pengetahuan, agar instrumen lebih konsisten dan sesuai konteks.

 Kata Kunci: kanker serviks, IVA, validitas, reliabilitas, Health Belief Model

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. H., Esa, A. M., & MohamedEl-zayat, O. (2018). Health Belief Model-based educational program about cervical cancer prevention on women knowledge and beliefs. Egyptian Nursing Journal, 15(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.4103/enj.enj_38_17

Aldohaian, A. I., Alshammari, S. A., & Arafah, D. M. (2019). Using the health belief model to assess beliefs and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening among Saudi women: A cross-sectional observational study. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0701-2

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian (Edisi Revi). Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. (2021). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Pustaka Belajar.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. In Frontiers in Public Health (Vol. 6). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Champion, V., Maraj, M., Hui, S., Perkins, A. J., Tierney, W., Menon, U., & Skinner, C. S. (2003). Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Preventive Medicine, 36(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00038-5

Chauhan, A. S., Prinja, S., Srinivasan, R., Rai, B., Malliga, J. S., Jyani, G., Gupta, N., & Ghoshal, S. (2020). Cost effectiveness of strategies for cervical cancer prevention in India. PLoS ONE, 15(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238291

Devellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.) (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Donnelly, T. T. (2008). Challenges in providing breast and cervical cancer screening services to Vietnamese Canadian women : the healthcare providers ’ perspective. 15(2), 158–168.

Farajimakin, O. (2024). Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65555

Globocan. (2020). Cancer Incident in Indonesia. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 858, 1–2. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/360-indonesia-fact-sheets.pdf

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS EIGHTH EDITION. Annabel Ainscow. www.cengage.com/highered

Jia, Y., Li, S., Yang, R., Zhou, H., Xiang, Q., Hu, T., Zhang, Q., Chen, Z., Ma, D., & Feng, L. (2013). Knowledge about Cervical Cancer and Barriers of Screening Program among Women in Wufeng County, a High-Incidence Region of Cervical Cancer in China. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067005

Jones, C. L., Jensen, J. D., Scherr, C. L., Brown, N. R., Christy, K., & Weaver, J. (2015). The Health Belief Model as an Explanatory Framework in Communication Research: Exploring Parallel, Serial, and Moderated Mediation. Health Communication, 30(6), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.873363

Kemenkes RI. (2015). Panduan program nasional gerakan pencegahan dan deteksi dini kannker leher rahim dan kanker payudara 21 april 2015. In Direktorat Pengendalian Penyakit Tidak Menular (Number April, pp. 1–47). https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2018). Essentials of Nursing Research. In C. C. Burns (Ed.), Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada (Nine editi, Vol. 5, Number 1). LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS.

Sadikin, B. G. (2023). National Action Plan for Cervical Cancer Elimination in Indonesia 2023-2030. In Kementerian Kesehatan RI (Vol. 4, Number 1).

Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Caimey, J. (2015). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press.

Sugiono. (2016). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Alvabeta.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research. In International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) (Vol. 5, Number 3). www.elvedit.com

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. In International journal of medical education (Vol. 2, pp. 53–55). https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

WHO. (2021). WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition: use of mRNA tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) (World Health Organization, Ed.; Second edition). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030824

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

Issue

Section

Articles